Search results
Create the page "Review" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...(both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links Here is the example: [[Review Queue]]919 bytes (150 words) - 06:47, 16 December 2012
- ...nto the D Standard Library ([[Phobos]]). The review process is explained [[Review/Process|here]]. == Current Review Queue ==10 KB (1,322 words) - 12:30, 9 September 2016
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 12:54, 28 September 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Review Queue]]26 bytes (3 words) - 06:20, 16 December 2012
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 12:57, 28 September 2013
- == Review 1 == [http://forum.dlang.org/post/adyanbsdsxsfdpvoozne@forum.dlang.org Review thread]3 KB (455 words) - 13:47, 28 September 2013
- ...o decide if it makes sense to continue with a vote or postpone for a later review. ...ions must run through a [http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html Boost Review cycle] as described below. It is suggested that you post to the [http://for6 KB (1,027 words) - 21:55, 15 January 2014
- == Review 1 == There were no critical concerns raised (by review manager opinion) but Brian has decided to address some of smaller ones befo4 KB (519 words) - 12:49, 13 October 2013
- ...g/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com Initial pre-review discussion] == Review 1 ==7 KB (959 words) - 16:42, 28 January 2015
- == Review 1 == === Review thread ===2 KB (262 words) - 09:17, 21 January 2014
- Early discussion / review stage, preparation for formal review681 bytes (94 words) - 12:40, 8 February 2014
- ...xers authored by Brian Schott. It supercedes [http://wiki.dlang.org/?title=Review/std.d.lexer std.d.lexer] as a more generalized attempt. # [http://forum.dlang.org/post/aiipgaqyddjijpjiulfu@forum.dlang.org Review thread]638 bytes (92 words) - 07:14, 30 April 2015
- ==Review== Anyone may review your pull and raise issues. Either fix the issues or address why you did i729 bytes (134 words) - 10:27, 5 June 2014
- 1 KB (190 words) - 14:31, 25 July 2015
- The D Language Foundation conducts a Review of Progress with each scholarship recipient every three months since the st == Self Review ==3 KB (473 words) - 01:14, 10 March 2017
Page text matches
- * [[Review Queue]]7 KB (951 words) - 06:30, 4 September 2023
- * Review all Phobos modules for compatibility with ranges (std.zip, for example, wa == Review pull requests ==13 KB (2,079 words) - 12:48, 11 March 2021
- ...h?v=Zs8O7MVmlfw CyberShadow's presentation] at Dconf 2013 for an excellent review of the differences).17 KB (2,456 words) - 10:25, 25 March 2023
- ...(both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links Here is the example: [[Review Queue]]919 bytes (150 words) - 06:47, 16 December 2012
- ...nto the D Standard Library ([[Phobos]]). The review process is explained [[Review/Process|here]]. == Current Review Queue ==10 KB (1,322 words) - 12:30, 9 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Review Queue]]26 bytes (3 words) - 06:20, 16 December 2012
- ...hael V. Franklin has done some work bare-metal ARM which is worthwhile to review: * '''std.parallelism''' (Russell) std.parallelism needs a review and some benchmarking - prior to making improvements. As part of this is wo14 KB (2,288 words) - 04:08, 31 December 2016
- == Review 1 == [http://forum.dlang.org/post/adyanbsdsxsfdpvoozne@forum.dlang.org Review thread]3 KB (455 words) - 13:47, 28 September 2013
- ...o decide if it makes sense to continue with a vote or postpone for a later review. ...ions must run through a [http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html Boost Review cycle] as described below. It is suggested that you post to the [http://for6 KB (1,027 words) - 21:55, 15 January 2014
- | 2 ||review all Phobos modules for compatibility with ranges - std.zip, for example, wa | 11 || review all of Phobos for @safe compatibility || [http://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/11 KB (1,753 words) - 09:24, 1 May 2020
- * Review uses of '''IN_GCC''': If changes have been (or can be) made which allow for9 KB (1,306 words) - 20:04, 1 September 2015
- == Review 1 == There were no critical concerns raised (by review manager opinion) but Brian has decided to address some of smaller ones befo4 KB (519 words) - 12:49, 13 October 2013
- ...g/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com Initial pre-review discussion] == Review 1 ==7 KB (959 words) - 16:42, 28 January 2015
- == Review 1 == === Review thread ===2 KB (262 words) - 09:17, 21 January 2014
- ...` package (exact module separation being discussed as part of pull request review)8 KB (1,137 words) - 18:35, 7 March 2014
- ...s aims to keep a record of the current status of both policy and technical review. | [https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00582.html Under Review] (FSF approved for inclusion)9 KB (1,363 words) - 22:15, 28 October 2018
- Early discussion / review stage, preparation for formal review681 bytes (94 words) - 12:40, 8 February 2014
- There are two proposals: std.logger and std.log (see [[Review Queue]]). In accordance with the community a module should be finalized. Reviving the proposed std.benchmark (see [[Review Queue]]) and finishing it up for inclusion in Phobos is one option.18 KB (2,945 words) - 20:23, 1 September 2015
- Under review == Review 1 ==2 KB (231 words) - 19:55, 16 March 2014
- ...xers authored by Brian Schott. It supercedes [http://wiki.dlang.org/?title=Review/std.d.lexer std.d.lexer] as a more generalized attempt. # [http://forum.dlang.org/post/aiipgaqyddjijpjiulfu@forum.dlang.org Review thread]638 bytes (92 words) - 07:14, 30 April 2015
