Can we lessen the rules to allow linkage to our D binary for additional D modules (not for the module which does plain C linkage)?
The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --Porton (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Replied on the forum:
- --Vladimir Panteleev (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)