Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deimos"

From D Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(I ask to lessen no D linkage rule)
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --[[User:Porton|Porton]] ([[User talk:Porton|talk]]) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 
The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --[[User:Porton|Porton]] ([[User talk:Porton|talk]]) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
: Replied on the forum:
 +
:* https://forum.dlang.org/post/hqcvdsoopxmwaekciume@forum.dlang.org
 +
:* https://forum.dlang.org/post/mnkpiytrvpxteijckgnt@forum.dlang.org
 +
: --[[User:Vladimir Panteleev|Vladimir Panteleev]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Panteleev|talk]]) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:33, 24 January 2019

Can we lessen the rules to allow linkage to our D binary for additional D modules (not for the module which does plain C linkage)?

The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --Porton (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Replied on the forum:
--Vladimir Panteleev (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)