Difference between revisions of "Talk:DIP32"

From D Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== About $identifier == Why not require normal declaration syntax, when a variable should be declared in unpacking? Suggested in DIP: <source lang="D"> switch (tup) { ca...")
 
(Variable declaration in case statements: new section)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
int x;
 
int x;
 
{x, int y} = tup;
 
{x, int y} = tup;
 +
</source>
 +
 +
== Variable declaration in case statements ==
 +
 +
Care must be taken when variable declaration is used in combination with fall through / '''goto case''' in case statements:
 +
 +
<source lang="D">
 +
switch (tup) {
 +
    case {1, 2}:
 +
    case {$, 2}:
 +
        goto case;
 +
    case {1, x}:
 +
        // what is x if tup == {1, 2}?
 +
}
 
</source>
 
</source>

Revision as of 20:11, 31 July 2014

About $identifier

Why not require normal declaration syntax, when a variable should be declared in unpacking?

Suggested in DIP:

switch (tup) {
    case {1, 2}:
    case {$, 2}:
    case {1, x}:
    default:
}
// -----------------------------
int x = 1;
if (auto {$x, y} = coord) { ... }

My suggestion:

switch (tup) {
    case {1, 2}:
    case {$, 2}:
    case {1, auto x}:
    default:
}
// -----------------------------
int x = 1;
if ({x, auto y} = coord) { ... }

This would be more consistent with how if usually works (expression syntax => use existing variable, declaration syntax => declare variable initialized with the value of the comparison), doesn't require this special syntax which is used nowhere else in the language, and makes it obvious that a declaration takes place.

It also allows to use unpacking everywhere:

int x;
{x, int y} = tup;

Variable declaration in case statements

Care must be taken when variable declaration is used in combination with fall through / goto case in case statements:

switch (tup) {
    case {1, 2}:
    case {$, 2}:
        goto case;
    case {1, x}:
        // what is x if tup == {1, 2}?
}