Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

  • ...(both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links Here is the example: [[Review Queue]]
    919 bytes (150 words) - 06:47, 16 December 2012
  • ...nto the D Standard Library ([[Phobos]]). The review process is explained [[Review/Process|here]]. == Current Review Queue ==
    10 KB (1,322 words) - 12:30, 9 September 2016
  • 0 bytes (0 words) - 12:54, 28 September 2013
  • #REDIRECT [[Review Queue]]
    26 bytes (3 words) - 06:20, 16 December 2012
  • 0 bytes (0 words) - 12:57, 28 September 2013
  • == Review 1 == [http://forum.dlang.org/post/adyanbsdsxsfdpvoozne@forum.dlang.org Review thread]
    3 KB (455 words) - 13:47, 28 September 2013
  • ...o decide if it makes sense to continue with a vote or postpone for a later review. ...ions must run through a [http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html Boost Review cycle] as described below. It is suggested that you post to the [http://for
    6 KB (1,027 words) - 21:55, 15 January 2014
  • == Review 1 == There were no critical concerns raised (by review manager opinion) but Brian has decided to address some of smaller ones befo
    4 KB (519 words) - 12:49, 13 October 2013
  • ...g/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com Initial pre-review discussion] == Review 1 ==
    7 KB (959 words) - 16:42, 28 January 2015
  • == Review 1 == === Review thread ===
    2 KB (262 words) - 09:17, 21 January 2014
  • Early discussion / review stage, preparation for formal review
    681 bytes (94 words) - 12:40, 8 February 2014
  • ...xers authored by Brian Schott. It supercedes [http://wiki.dlang.org/?title=Review/std.d.lexer std.d.lexer] as a more generalized attempt. # [http://forum.dlang.org/post/aiipgaqyddjijpjiulfu@forum.dlang.org Review thread]
    638 bytes (92 words) - 07:14, 30 April 2015
  • ==Review== Anyone may review your pull and raise issues. Either fix the issues or address why you did i
    729 bytes (134 words) - 10:27, 5 June 2014
  • 1 KB (190 words) - 14:31, 25 July 2015
  • The D Language Foundation conducts a Review of Progress with each scholarship recipient every three months since the st == Self Review ==
    3 KB (473 words) - 01:14, 10 March 2017

Page text matches

  • * [[Review Queue]]
    7 KB (972 words) - 16:53, 27 May 2021
  • * Review all Phobos modules for compatibility with ranges (std.zip, for example, wa == Review pull requests ==
    13 KB (2,079 words) - 12:48, 11 March 2021
  • ...h?v=Zs8O7MVmlfw CyberShadow's presentation] at Dconf 2013 for an excellent review of the differences).
    17 KB (2,439 words) - 00:47, 24 May 2021
  • ...(both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links Here is the example: [[Review Queue]]
    919 bytes (150 words) - 06:47, 16 December 2012
  • ...nto the D Standard Library ([[Phobos]]). The review process is explained [[Review/Process|here]]. == Current Review Queue ==
    10 KB (1,322 words) - 12:30, 9 September 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Review Queue]]
    26 bytes (3 words) - 06:20, 16 December 2012
  • ...hael V. Franklin has done some work bare-metal ARM which is worthwhile to review: * '''std.parallelism''' (Russell) std.parallelism needs a review and some benchmarking - prior to making improvements. As part of this is wo
    14 KB (2,288 words) - 04:08, 31 December 2016
  • == Review 1 == [http://forum.dlang.org/post/adyanbsdsxsfdpvoozne@forum.dlang.org Review thread]
    3 KB (455 words) - 13:47, 28 September 2013
  • ...o decide if it makes sense to continue with a vote or postpone for a later review. ...ions must run through a [http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html Boost Review cycle] as described below. It is suggested that you post to the [http://for
    6 KB (1,027 words) - 21:55, 15 January 2014
  • | 2 ||review all Phobos modules for compatibility with ranges - std.zip, for example, wa | 11 || review all of Phobos for @safe compatibility || [http://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/28/
    11 KB (1,753 words) - 09:24, 1 May 2020
  • * Review uses of '''IN_GCC''': If changes have been (or can be) made which allow for
    9 KB (1,306 words) - 20:04, 1 September 2015
  • == Review 1 == There were no critical concerns raised (by review manager opinion) but Brian has decided to address some of smaller ones befo
    4 KB (519 words) - 12:49, 13 October 2013
  • ...g/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com Initial pre-review discussion] == Review 1 ==
    7 KB (959 words) - 16:42, 28 January 2015
  • == Review 1 == === Review thread ===
    2 KB (262 words) - 09:17, 21 January 2014
  • ...` package (exact module separation being discussed as part of pull request review)
    8 KB (1,137 words) - 18:35, 7 March 2014
  • ...s aims to keep a record of the current status of both policy and technical review. | [https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00582.html Under Review] (FSF approved for inclusion)
    9 KB (1,363 words) - 22:15, 28 October 2018
  • Early discussion / review stage, preparation for formal review
    681 bytes (94 words) - 12:40, 8 February 2014
  • There are two proposals: std.logger and std.log (see [[Review Queue]]). In accordance with the community a module should be finalized. Reviving the proposed std.benchmark (see [[Review Queue]]) and finishing it up for inclusion in Phobos is one option.
    18 KB (2,945 words) - 20:23, 1 September 2015
  • Under review == Review 1 ==
    2 KB (231 words) - 19:55, 16 March 2014
  • ...xers authored by Brian Schott. It supercedes [http://wiki.dlang.org/?title=Review/std.d.lexer std.d.lexer] as a more generalized attempt. # [http://forum.dlang.org/post/aiipgaqyddjijpjiulfu@forum.dlang.org Review thread]
    638 bytes (92 words) - 07:14, 30 April 2015
  • * Final review/testing ...ewer/supervisor when the story is nearing completion. This will be an open review/testing according to the full standards held for any other PR (including ni
    5 KB (734 words) - 16:31, 11 December 2016
  • ....28Oct_2014.29]]) of this release. Please use it as a guide throughout the review process. Additionally, resolution of [https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi? || Requires review
    6 KB (873 words) - 23:37, 20 September 2014
  • ==Review== Anyone may review your pull and raise issues. Either fix the issues or address why you did i
    729 bytes (134 words) - 10:27, 5 June 2014
  • ...hael V. Franklin has done some work bare-metal ARM which is worthwhile to review: * '''std.parallelism''' (Russell) std.parallelism needs a review and some benchmarking - prior to making improvements. As part of this is wo
    16 KB (2,611 words) - 23:08, 26 December 2016
  • ...he language or the standard library is made and given a number. There is a review process and ultimately a decision is made to either approve or reject the D
    785 bytes (119 words) - 17:48, 13 March 2018
  • * [[:Category:Review‏‎|Review]] (2 members)
    2 KB (205 words) - 02:11, 17 August 2018
  • This will submit your changes for review by the D maintainers. If your changes are approved, they will be merged int * They are hard to review.
    19 KB (3,064 words) - 18:28, 11 December 2019
  • == H2 2016 Review ==
    5 KB (666 words) - 20:32, 2 June 2018
  • std.parallelism needs a review and some benchmarking - prior to making improvements. As part of this is wo
    18 KB (2,845 words) - 18:07, 5 December 2017
  • == Review process == ...<code>std.experimental</code> first (after they pass the [[Review/Process|review process]])
    11 KB (1,777 words) - 00:04, 22 March 2018
  • == H1 2016 Review == ...ore the end of H1. Currently the application has been drafted and is under review by a CPA and an attorney.
    5 KB (808 words) - 05:42, 18 May 2018
  • == Review workflow (squashed commits & write access to PRs) == ...ets commits '''appended''' until its final approval, s.t. you only need to review the added changes.
    12 KB (1,981 words) - 14:20, 24 February 2021
  • The D Language Foundation conducts a Review of Progress with each scholarship recipient every three months since the st == Self Review ==
    3 KB (473 words) - 01:14, 10 March 2017
  • == H1 2017 Review == ** avoid PRs being stalled in the review queue
    6 KB (842 words) - 20:33, 2 June 2018
  • ...rtional to the issue. Do not make one small matter the focus of the entire review. * The main question about each individual review point is: does this block acceptance or not?
    2 KB (329 words) - 07:47, 2 March 2018
  • std.parallelism needs a review and some benchmarking - prior to making improvements. As part of this is wo
    34 KB (5,227 words) - 09:35, 2 October 2019
  • ...needs some tweaks to improve performance. The issue here is that n active review of `std.parallelism` is due.
    26 KB (4,057 words) - 09:39, 2 October 2019
  • == H2 2017 Review ==
    6 KB (928 words) - 13:14, 11 May 2019