Difference between revisions of "Meta/Up for Review"
(suggestion) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the front page should have a section pointing to current proposals up for review for submission into the Phobos library. For example, Alex Rønne Petersen is currently in the midst of reviewing/testing and getting feedback for the new [https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/tree/new-std-process-update std.process] module by Lars T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer. These reviews can get easily lost in forum noise and i think a wiki page dedicated to these proposals might make things easier. The article can contain a table of proposals (both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links and the participants discuss changes etc... | I think the front page should have a section pointing to current proposals up for review for submission into the Phobos library. For example, Alex Rønne Petersen is currently in the midst of reviewing/testing and getting feedback for the new [https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/tree/new-std-process-update std.process] module by Lars T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer. These reviews can get easily lost in forum noise and i think a wiki page dedicated to these proposals might make things easier. The article can contain a table of proposals (both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links and the participants discuss changes etc... | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here is the example: [[Up for Review]] | ||
| + | If nobody likes it we can always just delete it | ||
Revision as of 06:16, 16 December 2012
I think the front page should have a section pointing to current proposals up for review for submission into the Phobos library. For example, Alex Rønne Petersen is currently in the midst of reviewing/testing and getting feedback for the new std.process module by Lars T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer. These reviews can get easily lost in forum noise and i think a wiki page dedicated to these proposals might make things easier. The article can contain a table of proposals (both live and accepted/rejected) with links to specialized pages such as "Review/std.process" where the lead reviewer can post a summary and relavent links and the participants discuss changes etc...
Here is the example: Up for Review If nobody likes it we can always just delete it
