Difference between revisions of "DIP83"

From D Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 163: Line 163:
 
const a = iota(0, n).array;
 
const a = iota(0, n).array;
 
const b = a.dup;
 
const b = a.dup;
b[1_000 .. 1_002] = 0;
+
a[1_000 .. 1_002] = 0;
 
assert(a == b);
 
assert(a == b);
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>
Line 172: Line 172:
 
(a[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [0, 0]) != (b[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [1_000, 1=001])
 
(a[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [0, 0]) != (b[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [1_000, 1=001])
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 
</syntaxhighlight>
 +
 +
An optional `multiLine` flag could when set format output as
 +
 +
<syntaxhighlight lang="d">
 +
(a[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [0, 0]) !=
 +
(b[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [1_000, 1=001])
 +
</syntaxhighlight>
 +
 +
to make comparison more visual.
 +
 
Parts of the solution list at
 
Parts of the solution list at
  

Revision as of 18:11, 26 October 2015

Title: Configurable Assert Diagnostics
DIP: 83
Version: 1
Status: Draft
Created: 2015-10-01
Last Modified: 2015-10-26
Author: Per Nordlöw
Links:

Abstract

Allow for assert to do pretty printing of its failing expression when flagged for in call to compiler. Printing is configurable via specific sets of (template) function overloads.

Rationale

A failing assert (in a unittest), currently, give no hint about why it failed. To aid the developer in debugging, the failing assert of a

  • binary expression, such as assert(x == y), should print the values of x and y and
  • unary expression, such as assert(!x), should print the value of x.

This extra, so called, pretty printing can be enabled by changing the dmd flag -unittest to, say, -unittest=verbose for a specific failing module. This will be more convenient than explicitly adding the prints of the left-hand-side expression lhs and right-hand-side expression rhs directly before the call to the failing assert.

Description

This DIP proposes to add library-level-configurable diagnostics to failing calls to assert(expr) typically called from within unittest-blocks.

This diagnostics is activated only when DMD is called with a specific command line flag, say -unittest=verbose or perhaps -diagnose=assert.

Binary Operator Lowering

If DMD is called with this flag it will rewrite (lower) all assert expressions (AssertExpr in dmd source) such as

assert(a BINOP b)

into

(auto ref a, auto ref b) {
    if (a BINOP b) return;
    onAssertFailed!"BINOP"(a, b, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, __MODULE__);
} (e1, e2)

where onAssertFailed, in this binary operator case, is declared as

void onAssertFailed(string op, E1, E2)(E1 e1, E2 e2, const string file, uint line, string function, string module);

Unary Operator Lowering

Similarly, for unary expressions, rewrite (lower)

assert(UNOP e)

with

(auto ref e) {
    if (UNOP e) return;
    onAssertFailed!"UNOP"(e, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, __MODULE__);
} (e)

where on onAssertFailed, in this unary operator case, is declared as

void onAssertFailed(string op, E)(E e, const string file, uint line, string function, string module);

Non-Operator Lowering

For the case when no unary or binary operator is present in the top assert expression, unary overload of onAssertFailed is called with op being empty string. In other words the assert expression

assert(e)

is rewritten (lowered) into

(auto ref e) {
    if (e) return;
    onAssertFailed!""(e, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, __MODULE__);
} (e)

Configuring Diagnostics

Specific printing behaviour of assert() diagnostics can then be extendable by adding (typically templated) overloads of onAssertFailed for specific sets of types (concepts).

For instance, diagnostics specifically when comparing arithmetic types, could be realized through the overload

import std.traits : isArithmetic;
void onAssertFailed(string op, E1, E2)(E1 e1, E2 e2, const string file, uint line, string function, string module)
    if (isArithmetic!L && isArithmetic!R)
{
    version(assert)
    {
        import core.exception : AssertError;
        throw AssertError("Failed arithmetic assert: " ~ e1 ~ " " ~ binOp ~ " " ~ e2);
    }
}

In this way D would get the extendability we want in testing-frameworks such as std.experimental.testing (https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207) without adding a new assert-overload-set and without sacrifycing default memory usage in DMD/Phobos unittests.

Further, this solution enables the possibility to provide fancy diagnostics behaviour in onAssertFailed for failing array/range or aggregate (struct or class) comparisons. This diagnostics could also have different pretty printing backends such as HTML.

Examples of Possible Diagnostics Outputs

For example a failing

assert([1,2,3] == [1,2,4]);

could pretty-print

([1,2,3][2] is 3) != ([1,2,4][2] is 4)

or, for aggregates, a failing

struct A { int x, y; }
auto a = A(1,2);
auto b = A(1,3);
assert(a == b);

could pretty-print

(a.y is 2) != (b.y is 3)

or, for arrays, a failing

const n = 1_000_000;
const a = iota(0, n).array;
const b = a.dup;
a[1_000 .. 1_002] = 0;
assert(a == b);

could pretty-print

(a[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [0, 0]) != (b[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [1_000, 1=001])

An optional `multiLine` flag could when set format output as

(a[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [0, 0]) !=
(b[1_000 .. 1_0002] is [1_000, 1=001])

to make comparison more visual.

Parts of the solution list at

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5547#c3

including rewriting/expansion of AssertExpr could probably reused.

Discussions on topic

Copyright

This document has been placed in the Public Domain.