Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open Source Projects"
Klickverbot (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Vision for this page? == To me, having a page titled »Open Source Projects« seems somewhat strange, given that there is also a »Libraries and Frameworks« list. Maybe, ...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
To me, having a page titled »Open Source Projects« seems somewhat strange, given that there is also a »Libraries and Frameworks« list. Maybe, we should split this page – put libs on the library page, and create a new page for tools? In any case, I think it doesn't make much sense to duplicate open source libraries here. --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 18:15, 27 November 2012 (CET) | To me, having a page titled »Open Source Projects« seems somewhat strange, given that there is also a »Libraries and Frameworks« list. Maybe, we should split this page – put libs on the library page, and create a new page for tools? In any case, I think it doesn't make much sense to duplicate open source libraries here. --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 18:15, 27 November 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | : IMO it's important to think from perspective of user. If someone wants to look how D source code looks, want to learn something from others code - that's the tab open source projects. It includes *tools* and libraries. Libraries and frameworks are separate thing, when you're looking for code that will do work for you - ideally, you shouldn't care about its internals. It might be opensource or not. But, generally i agree with you, we should do something with this. Now, when we got semantic mediawiki it will be easier to make better categorisation and customization for each use-case. | ||
| + | --[[User:Shd|Shd]] ([[User talk:Shd|talk]]) 19:01, 29 November 2012 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 29 November 2012
Vision for this page?
To me, having a page titled »Open Source Projects« seems somewhat strange, given that there is also a »Libraries and Frameworks« list. Maybe, we should split this page – put libs on the library page, and create a new page for tools? In any case, I think it doesn't make much sense to duplicate open source libraries here. --Klickverbot (talk) 18:15, 27 November 2012 (CET)
- IMO it's important to think from perspective of user. If someone wants to look how D source code looks, want to learn something from others code - that's the tab open source projects. It includes *tools* and libraries. Libraries and frameworks are separate thing, when you're looking for code that will do work for you - ideally, you shouldn't care about its internals. It might be opensource or not. But, generally i agree with you, we should do something with this. Now, when we got semantic mediawiki it will be easier to make better categorisation and customization for each use-case.
