Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deimos"
(I ask to lessen no D linkage rule) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --[[User:Porton|Porton]] ([[User talk:Porton|talk]]) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --[[User:Porton|Porton]] ([[User talk:Porton|talk]]) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Replied on the forum: | ||
| + | :* https://forum.dlang.org/post/hqcvdsoopxmwaekciume@forum.dlang.org | ||
| + | :* https://forum.dlang.org/post/mnkpiytrvpxteijckgnt@forum.dlang.org | ||
| + | : --[[User:Vladimir Panteleev|Vladimir Panteleev]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Panteleev|talk]]) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:33, 24 January 2019
Can we lessen the rules to allow linkage to our D binary for additional D modules (not for the module which does plain C linkage)?
The idea to avoid D linkage was probably wise, but why to require it for every module? We could allow to compile and link additional modules (such as object-oriented wrappers above the linked C code). --Porton (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Replied on the forum:
- --Vladimir Panteleev (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
