Difference between revisions of "GDC/ProjectIdeas"
(remove outdated points) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* There are lots of bugs in [http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org bugzilla]. Everyone is welcome to look at them, reproduce them, comment on them, fix them, etc! | * There are lots of bugs in [http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org bugzilla]. Everyone is welcome to look at them, reproduce them, comment on them, fix them, etc! | ||
− | * | + | * Other platforms should start being tested with the CI system. |
* There are a number of '''XBUG''' markers in testsuite. Some of them are for bugs in GDC that no one has looked at in a long time. There should be fewer! | * There are a number of '''XBUG''' markers in testsuite. Some of them are for bugs in GDC that no one has looked at in a long time. There should be fewer! | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* Merging GDC into upstream GCC. | * Merging GDC into upstream GCC. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Porting D to MinGW. | * Porting D to MinGW. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* GCC LTO support is broken horribly, any attempt to use LTO will result in ICE'ing the LTO compiler. | * GCC LTO support is broken horribly, any attempt to use LTO will result in ICE'ing the LTO compiler. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Support all variants of <code>--enable-threads=</code> and <code>--enable-tls</code> in the GC. | * Support all variants of <code>--enable-threads=</code> and <code>--enable-tls</code> in the GC. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 57: | Line 43: | ||
* Missing d/NEWS and d/CONTRIBUTE documentation. | * Missing d/NEWS and d/CONTRIBUTE documentation. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* The GDC manpage d/gdc.texi could be better written. | * The GDC manpage d/gdc.texi could be better written. | ||
Line 84: | Line 68: | ||
'''Maintenance''' | '''Maintenance''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* To be considered as a project part of GCC, the code in GDC should ideally conform to [http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html coding standards] of GCC. This should be fixed up in all areas of the code - whatever standard the D frontend or Phobos uses from upstream is not a concern. | * To be considered as a project part of GCC, the code in GDC should ideally conform to [http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html coding standards] of GCC. This should be fixed up in all areas of the code - whatever standard the D frontend or Phobos uses from upstream is not a concern. | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 18:21, 24 December 2016
This is a list of project ideas for GDC - potential improvements, new features, et cetera. As well as a list of ongoing projects going on within GDC.
Fix known bugs
- There are lots of bugs in bugzilla. Everyone is welcome to look at them, reproduce them, comment on them, fix them, etc!
- Other platforms should start being tested with the CI system.
- There are a number of XBUG markers in testsuite. Some of them are for bugs in GDC that no one has looked at in a long time. There should be fewer!
Periodic Tasks
- Merge the
d/dfrontend
sources with upstream DMD releases.
- Merge the
libphobos/libdruntime
sources with upstream Druntime releases.
- Merge the
libphobos/src
sources with upstream Phobos releases.
- Create a release branch and test building GDC with each GCC release.
- Update the latest development branch of GDC to be continually in sync with latest GCC development changes.
See GDC/CurrentReleaseTasks for version specific tasks.
General
(These listed are mixed active/idle stuff that needs more explanation of what's going on!)
- Merging GDC into upstream GCC.
- Porting D to MinGW.
- GCC LTO support is broken horribly, any attempt to use LTO will result in ICE'ing the LTO compiler.
- Support all variants of
--enable-threads=
and--enable-tls
in the GC.
Documentation
- The documentation in d/README is inadequately little, and contains references to old changes that are no where else to be found. This should be improved, and old documentation archived on the wiki.
- Missing d/NEWS and d/CONTRIBUTE documentation.
- The GDC manpage d/gdc.texi could be better written.
- GDC Extended Assembler needs better documentation with multiple examples, such as that found in LDP for GCC.
Internals
d/d-asmstmt.cc
- This file implements the
ExtAsmStatement
class that handles GCC-style inline assembler may be a problem as is non-standard to the D frontend. - It also currently does not handle the ability to jump to D labels via a fifth section after the clobber list contains a list of all labels to which the assembly may jump (ie: Just like
__asm__ goto
in GCC).
- This file implements the
- The only supported GDC-style
@attribute
's are"noinline"
,"forceinline"
,"flatten"
, and"target"
. This may need extending as seen fit.
d/d-dmd-gcc.h
- This header is the only glue header used by the D frontend, this implements GDC-specific function hooks that call the GCC backend / performs platform agnostic tasks while the frontend is still in its semantic stages. This header should not really exist, and all functions be moved to a common header (ie:
target.h
) shared between compiler backends.
- This header is the only glue header used by the D frontend, this implements GDC-specific function hooks that call the GCC backend / performs platform agnostic tasks while the frontend is still in its semantic stages. This header should not really exist, and all functions be moved to a common header (ie:
- The macros
IN_GCC
andGCC_SAFE_DMD
which are used to conditionally compile code in the frontend to work against GDC and its backend should be gradually removed from the D frontend, and either made into a runtime hook (ie:target.h
,port.h
, etc), or GDC (or DMD) should be fixed to handle the discrepancy between compiler backends.
d/lang.opt
- Remove
-fsplit-dynamic-arrays
code-gen switch and clean-up expand_intrinsic; d_build_call; etc...
- Remove
Maintenance
- To be considered as a project part of GCC, the code in GDC should ideally conform to coding standards of GCC. This should be fixed up in all areas of the code - whatever standard the D frontend or Phobos uses from upstream is not a concern.