Difference between revisions of "DWiki:Projects View"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
My proposition is, make a project name an URL to project page, and replace links section with license. Platform might be useful too. | My proposition is, make a project name an URL to project page, and replace links section with license. Platform might be useful too. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : I agree! Sounds good. We have to have a page for each "thing" anyway, sooner or later, in order to use categories etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | : A bit off-topic, but I further think we need a new approach to managing data like projects, websites, people etc. alltogether. While MediaWiki is great for encyclopedia-like content, it's not too good with database-like content. I've come across [http://semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic MediaWiki Extension] which seems ideal, and I've also [[User_talk:Vladimir_Panteleev|asked CyberShadow about it]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : In short, Semantic MediaWiki would allow us to have queryable properties for each page, something like a "database layer", and then have pages with "views" into it. We could then have a page like "Stable cross-platform open source projects and framworks" or "Stable and Experimental Projects for Linux" or "Open source projects looking for help" etc. — all without any data duplication and just achieved using simple queries. We could also provide better cross-linking so that you can see all projects a certain developer is involved in, which can be a great way of finding new projects that has a certain style you like, without making every person or project into a Category or without manually construcing that list for each developer, which is boung to be out-of-sync. There's also custom forms, filter-by-property-search, map views (nice for DUGs, events etc?) and more. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : We can still reorganise and add data now, of course, whether we use Semantic Mediawiki or not in the future. I say add the licenses and make the changes you proposed! My 2¢ --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 00:13, 26 November 2012 (CET) |
Revision as of 23:13, 25 November 2012
I think we should include at least a license in projects tables.
My proposition is, make a project name an URL to project page, and replace links section with license. Platform might be useful too.
- I agree! Sounds good. We have to have a page for each "thing" anyway, sooner or later, in order to use categories etc.
- **
- A bit off-topic, but I further think we need a new approach to managing data like projects, websites, people etc. alltogether. While MediaWiki is great for encyclopedia-like content, it's not too good with database-like content. I've come across Semantic MediaWiki Extension which seems ideal, and I've also asked CyberShadow about it.
- In short, Semantic MediaWiki would allow us to have queryable properties for each page, something like a "database layer", and then have pages with "views" into it. We could then have a page like "Stable cross-platform open source projects and framworks" or "Stable and Experimental Projects for Linux" or "Open source projects looking for help" etc. — all without any data duplication and just achieved using simple queries. We could also provide better cross-linking so that you can see all projects a certain developer is involved in, which can be a great way of finding new projects that has a certain style you like, without making every person or project into a Category or without manually construcing that list for each developer, which is boung to be out-of-sync. There's also custom forms, filter-by-property-search, map views (nice for DUGs, events etc?) and more.