Difference between revisions of "Talk:DIP32"
(Created page with "== About $identifier == Why not require normal declaration syntax, when a variable should be declared in unpacking? Suggested in DIP: <source lang="D"> switch (tup) { ca...") |
(→Variable declaration in case statements: new section) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
int x; | int x; | ||
{x, int y} = tup; | {x, int y} = tup; | ||
+ | </source> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Variable declaration in case statements == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Care must be taken when variable declaration is used in combination with fall through / '''goto case''' in case statements: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <source lang="D"> | ||
+ | switch (tup) { | ||
+ | case {1, 2}: | ||
+ | case {$, 2}: | ||
+ | goto case; | ||
+ | case {1, x}: | ||
+ | // what is x if tup == {1, 2}? | ||
+ | } | ||
</source> | </source> |
Revision as of 20:11, 31 July 2014
About $identifier
Why not require normal declaration syntax, when a variable should be declared in unpacking?
Suggested in DIP:
switch (tup) {
case {1, 2}:
case {$, 2}:
case {1, x}:
default:
}
// -----------------------------
int x = 1;
if (auto {$x, y} = coord) { ... }
My suggestion:
switch (tup) {
case {1, 2}:
case {$, 2}:
case {1, auto x}:
default:
}
// -----------------------------
int x = 1;
if ({x, auto y} = coord) { ... }
This would be more consistent with how if usually works (expression syntax => use existing variable, declaration syntax => declare variable initialized with the value of the comparison), doesn't require this special syntax which is used nowhere else in the language, and makes it obvious that a declaration takes place.
It also allows to use unpacking everywhere:
int x;
{x, int y} = tup;
Variable declaration in case statements
Care must be taken when variable declaration is used in combination with fall through / goto case in case statements:
switch (tup) {
case {1, 2}:
case {$, 2}:
goto case;
case {1, x}:
// what is x if tup == {1, 2}?
}