Difference between revisions of "DIP25"
(→DIP25: Sealed references) |
(→Abstract) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| + | D offers a number of features aimed at systems-level coding, such as unrestricted pointers, casting between integers and pointers, and the [http://dlang.org/function.html#system-functions <code>@system</code>] attribute. These means, combined with the other features of D, make it a complete and expressive language for systems-level tasks. On the other hand, economy of means should be exercised in defining such powerful but dangerous features. Most other features should offer good safety guarantees with little or no loss in efficiency or expressiveness. This proposal makes <code>ref</code> provide such a guarantee: with the proposed rules, it is impossible in safe code to have <code>ref</code> refer to a destroyed object. The restrictions introduced are not backward compatible, but disallow code that is stylistically questionable and that can be easily replaced either with equivalent and clearer code. | ||
== In a nutshell == | == In a nutshell == | ||
Revision as of 02:03, 6 February 2013
DIP25: Sealed references
| Title: | Sealed references |
|---|---|
| DIP: | 25 |
| Version: | 1 |
| Status: | Draft |
| Created: | 2013-02-05 |
| Last Modified: | 2013-02-05 |
| Author: | Andrei Alexandrescu and Walter Bright |
| Links: |
Abstract
D offers a number of features aimed at systems-level coding, such as unrestricted pointers, casting between integers and pointers, and the @system attribute. These means, combined with the other features of D, make it a complete and expressive language for systems-level tasks. On the other hand, economy of means should be exercised in defining such powerful but dangerous features. Most other features should offer good safety guarantees with little or no loss in efficiency or expressiveness. This proposal makes ref provide such a guarantee: with the proposed rules, it is impossible in safe code to have ref refer to a destroyed object. The restrictions introduced are not backward compatible, but disallow code that is stylistically questionable and that can be easily replaced either with equivalent and clearer code.
In a nutshell
Description
Copyright
This document has been placed in the Public Domain.
