Difference between revisions of "Review/std.process"
m (added category) |
m (added link to file as a stand-in for documenation, was unable to generate ddoc) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* issue 3 | * issue 3 | ||
* etc... | * etc... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/blob/new-std-process-update/std/process.d Documentation] | ||
=== Authors === | === Authors === | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 16 December 2012
The new std.process module address the following issues...
- issue 1
- issue 2
- issue 3
- etc...
Authors
- Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Steven Schveighoffer
Statement
(alexrp) Hi,
I decided to take a stab at reviving the new std.process written by Lars T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer.
The result is here: [1]
I decided to extract the work into new commits because rebasing the old branch in Lars's repo was way too cumbersome after so many months (and that branch also had a lot of merge commits). The code is obviously not written by me; all I did was a couple of build and test fixes.
It currently works on 32-bit and 64-bit Linux. It would be great if someone could take it for a spin on OS X, FreeBSD, and Windows to see how it fares there (I'm particularly worried that I may have broken the Windows build).
Lars or Steven, would either of you be willing to go through the review process with this module? I sent the druntime changes upstream a while back, so the Phobos changes are really all that remain in order to have it included.
