Difference between revisions of "Talk:The D Programming Language"
(→Experimental Compilers: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Agree. We could have a (More...)-link to a page "ChatRooms" and list other chat rooms, and even perhaps related chats, like some general language development room etc. --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 20:49, 27 November 2012 (CET) | : Agree. We could have a (More...)-link to a page "ChatRooms" and list other chat rooms, and even perhaps related chats, like some general language development room etc. --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 20:49, 27 November 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Experimental Compilers == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can the content in [[Experimental_compilers|Experimental compilers]] be added as a sub-topic in [[Compilers]] ? (The link to [[Experimental_compilers|Experimental compilers]] in the '''Compilers & Tools''' section will not be necessary then. | ||
| + | --[[User:r_m_r|R m r]] | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 28 November 2012
#d at OFTC
Is this channel really frequented by people other than Alex, who seems to be idling in there right now? In my experience, #d@freenode is the "unofficial official" D channel (Andrei also tends to lurk around there), so I'd rather not overwhelm the users with irrelevant choices, which might lead them to conclude that there is not much activity surrounding D. --Klickverbot (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2012 (CET)
- Agree. We could have a (More...)-link to a page "ChatRooms" and list other chat rooms, and even perhaps related chats, like some general language development room etc. --Kraybit (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2012 (CET)
Experimental Compilers
Can the content in Experimental compilers be added as a sub-topic in Compilers ? (The link to Experimental compilers in the Compilers & Tools section will not be necessary then. --R m r
