Difference between revisions of "Compilers"
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| COFF | | COFF | ||
| COFF | | COFF | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 09:22, 11 May 2015
DMD »Digital Mars D compiler |
GDC »GCC D compiler |
LDC »LLVM D compiler |
Also see: Experimental compilers
Which compiler should I use?
If you're a beginner DMD is the recommended choice, as it is the implementation closest to the D Language Specification. Otherwise it depends on what you need, what platforms you intend to develop for, and your personal preferences. GDC and LDC both generate substantially faster binaries than DMD.
Comparison
| DMD | GDC | LDC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms |
|
|
|
| Architectures |
|
|
|
| Distribution | Source, multi-platform source/binary archive, Windows installer, packages for OS X (.dmg), Debian/Ubuntu (.deb), Fedora (.rpm), OpenSUSE (.rpm), Debian/Ubuntu repository via http://d-apt.sourceforge.net, OS-X homebrew and macports repositories. | Source, Windows binary archive, Debian/Ubuntu repository | Source, Linux / OS X binary archive, Debian/Ubuntu repository, Fedora repository, Gentoo repository |
| Backend | DMD (DMC fork) | GCC | LLVM |
| License | Frontend: GPL 1 or later / Artistic License
Backend: custom |
GPL 3 or later | LDC-specific code: 3-clause BSD |
| Inline assembler | Yes, x86 | Yes, GCC-style only (all targets) | Yes, D-style (x86) and GCC-style (all targets) |
| SIMD | Partial (?) | Partial (?) | Partial (?) |
Linux specific | |||
| Object file format | ELF | ELF | ELF |
Mac specific | |||
| Object file format | Mach-O | Mach-O | Mach-O |
Windows specific | |||
| Object file format | OMF (32) / COFF (64) | COFF | COFF |
