Difference between revisions of "DIP51"
(→Example) |
|||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
} | } | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category: DIP]] |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 1 September 2015
Title: | not-virtual-by-default |
---|---|
DIP: | 51 |
Version: | 1 |
Status: | Draft |
Created: | 2013-11-27 |
Last Modified: | 2013-11-27 |
Author: | Manu Evans |
Contents
Abstract
Virtual calls are inefficient, and through extensive discussion, it has been shown that it is impossible for an optimiser to safely finalise virtuals in any useful capacity in a non-JIT/VM environment. This DIP proposes that class methods need to be non-virtual by default, or D classes will always yield inferior performance characteristics to other native languages.
In support of this change, introduction of the 'virtual' keyword will be required, and a deprecation process similar to the introduction of override will be followed. 'final' will be preserved, and remain useful to effectively 'seal' a hierarchy, in the same way as is useful in Java, C++, and C# (via 'sealed').
Process
Introduction of virtual would be added in steps:
- The virtual keyword is introduced; it becomes a warning to declare a virtual base function not marked virtual.
- deprecate declaring virtual functions not marked virtual.
- It becomes a compile error; virtual is enforced.
At this point, all methods are marked with either 'virtual', 'override', 'final', 'abstract', or are implicitly final.
Example
class Base
{
f(); // <- warning->deprecated->error, f() is implicitly final
virtual g();
final h();
}
class Derived : Base
{
override f()
override g(); // <- valid
override h(); // <- error, h() is explicitly final
}
Interfaces
For brevity, it is safe to assume all methods of an interface are implicitly virtual.
interface Interface
{
f(); // <- implicitly virtual
}
class Class : Interface
{
override f(); // <- f() is declared in an interface, which is implicitly virtual
}