Difference between revisions of "Talk:Why program in D"
(typo) |
m (boilerplate) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
| + | |||
= Can a programmer only use one langauge? = | = Can a programmer only use one langauge? = | ||
If not, then why is the main argument for using D built around "switching"? Seems to imply there's some sort of battle. It also gives a certain negative feel to D, as if it's trying to conquer other langauges. I would prefer something in the lines of "Why use D" and focus more on presenting D on its own accord, rather than compare it to other languagess. For that there could be "D compared to X"-pages. I also don't think trying to paint other languages as bad is an effective argument. Just mention what D has and how it does things, people who know the pains of C++ can see inside their own minds the benefits of D, and those who don't know C++ doesn't need get dragged into a language war. --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 10:56, 22 November 2012 (CET) | If not, then why is the main argument for using D built around "switching"? Seems to imply there's some sort of battle. It also gives a certain negative feel to D, as if it's trying to conquer other langauges. I would prefer something in the lines of "Why use D" and focus more on presenting D on its own accord, rather than compare it to other languagess. For that there could be "D compared to X"-pages. I also don't think trying to paint other languages as bad is an effective argument. Just mention what D has and how it does things, people who know the pains of C++ can see inside their own minds the benefits of D, and those who don't know C++ doesn't need get dragged into a language war. --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 10:56, 22 November 2012 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:42, 14 December 2012
This is a talk page. It is to be used for discussion of potentially controversial or otherwise large changes to the article itself.
- Please use the Add Topic link to start a discussion on a separate topic. Don't start a new topic inside an unrelated section, as it will only cause confusion.
- As a rule, it is considered bad form to edit somebody else's comments. Instead, post your reply to their comments immediately after.
- Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) so that we know who said what.
Can a programmer only use one langauge?
If not, then why is the main argument for using D built around "switching"? Seems to imply there's some sort of battle. It also gives a certain negative feel to D, as if it's trying to conquer other langauges. I would prefer something in the lines of "Why use D" and focus more on presenting D on its own accord, rather than compare it to other languagess. For that there could be "D compared to X"-pages. I also don't think trying to paint other languages as bad is an effective argument. Just mention what D has and how it does things, people who know the pains of C++ can see inside their own minds the benefits of D, and those who don't know C++ doesn't need get dragged into a language war. --Kraybit (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2012 (CET)
