Difference between revisions of "Talk:The D Programming Language"
(Suggestion for front page layout) |
(→Experimental Compilers) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
| − | = | + | == Archives == |
| − | + | [[Talk:Main_Page/Archive 1]] | |
| − | |||
| − | + | == #d at OFTC == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Is this channel really frequented by people other than Alex, who seems to be idling in there right now? In my experience, #d@freenode is the "unofficial official" D channel (Andrei also tends to lurk around there), so I'd rather not overwhelm the users with irrelevant choices, which might lead them to conclude that there is not much activity surrounding D. --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 18:10, 27 November 2012 (CET) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | : Agree. We could have a (More...)-link to a page "ChatRooms" and list other chat rooms, and even perhaps related chats, like some general language development room etc. --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 20:49, 27 November 2012 (CET) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Experimental Compilers == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Can the content in [[Experimental_compilers|Experimental compilers]] be added as a sub-topic in [[Compilers]] ? (The link to [[Experimental_compilers|Experimental compilers]] in the '''Compilers & Tools''' section will not be necessary then. | |
| − | + | --[[User:r_m_r|R m r]] | |
| − | + | :Done. --[[User:Vladimir Panteleev|Vladimir Panteleev]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Panteleev|talk]]) 06:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | * [[ | + | == Tools == |
| − | + | Where to place | |
| − | + | * http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ | |
| − | + | * https://github.com/Hackerpilot/Dscanner | |
| − | + | --[[User:Dnewbie|dnewbie]] | |
| − | + | ||
| + | :I'd add a new page to the ''Compilers & Tools'' box, something like »Code Handling Tools« (needs a better name, but I don't have a good idea right now), and then add those entries to it. --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 00:15, 9 December 2012 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:09, 2 March 2016
This is a talk page. It is to be used for discussion of potentially controversial or otherwise large changes to the article itself.
- Please use the Add Topic link to start a discussion on a separate topic. Don't start a new topic inside an unrelated section, as it will only cause confusion.
- As a rule, it is considered bad form to edit somebody else's comments. Instead, post your reply to their comments immediately after.
- Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) so that we know who said what.
Archives
#d at OFTC
Is this channel really frequented by people other than Alex, who seems to be idling in there right now? In my experience, #d@freenode is the "unofficial official" D channel (Andrei also tends to lurk around there), so I'd rather not overwhelm the users with irrelevant choices, which might lead them to conclude that there is not much activity surrounding D. --Klickverbot (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2012 (CET)
- Agree. We could have a (More...)-link to a page "ChatRooms" and list other chat rooms, and even perhaps related chats, like some general language development room etc. --Kraybit (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2012 (CET)
Experimental Compilers
Can the content in Experimental compilers be added as a sub-topic in Compilers ? (The link to Experimental compilers in the Compilers & Tools section will not be necessary then. --R m r
- Done. --Vladimir Panteleev (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Tools
Where to place
--dnewbie
- I'd add a new page to the Compilers & Tools box, something like »Code Handling Tools« (needs a better name, but I don't have a good idea right now), and then add those entries to it. --Klickverbot (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2012 (CET)
