Difference between revisions of "Talk:DIP55"
FBergemann (talk | contribs) |
FBergemann (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Notes:''' <br> | '''Notes:''' <br> | ||
+) ASF-RBT still has to be tested, documented, and cleaned-up (re-align "insert" with experiences from "delete"), maybe still some errors to be fixed. <br> | +) ASF-RBT still has to be tested, documented, and cleaned-up (re-align "insert" with experiences from "delete"), maybe still some errors to be fixed. <br> | ||
| − | +) ASF-RBT is just an '''example''' for this new toolbox offered by functions having a *caller ptr for the calling function. | + | +) ASF-RBT was modelled on some existing legacy implementation. So it's far away from a natural implementation using the new programming model. <br> |
| + | +) ASF-RBT is just an '''example''' for this new toolbox offered by functions having a *caller ptr for the calling function. <br> | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 15 June 2016
2016-06-15 - FBergemann:
An initial version of
- ASF RBT Red/Black-Tree algorithm using this programming model w/o need for a parent ptr in the node structure.
- including delete operation - is available now.
I feel excited about the new way of programming :-)
And i am pretty sure, so far i only touched the top of an iceberg.
Notes:
+) ASF-RBT still has to be tested, documented, and cleaned-up (re-align "insert" with experiences from "delete"), maybe still some errors to be fixed.
+) ASF-RBT was modelled on some existing legacy implementation. So it's far away from a natural implementation using the new programming model.
+) ASF-RBT is just an example for this new toolbox offered by functions having a *caller ptr for the calling function.
