Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kraybit"
(→Visualization) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
Hi! Great to see somebody working on getting the Wiki up and running. However, one suggestion: In MediaWiki, [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Categories Categories] are probably much better suited for sorting articles into groups such as »Community«, »Dev« and so on than Namespaces (the colon prefixes) are. Most normal Wiki pages should be in [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Namespace the Main namespace]. Thanks! --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 01:58, 23 November 2012 (CET) | Hi! Great to see somebody working on getting the Wiki up and running. However, one suggestion: In MediaWiki, [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Categories Categories] are probably much better suited for sorting articles into groups such as »Community«, »Dev« and so on than Namespaces (the colon prefixes) are. Most normal Wiki pages should be in [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Namespace the Main namespace]. Thanks! --[[User:Klickverbot|Klickverbot]] ([[User talk:Klickverbot|talk]]) 01:58, 23 November 2012 (CET) | ||
:Regarding Categories / Namespaces — Thanks for the enlightenment! : ) I don't really know MediaWiki, I'll stop using namespaces and edit them out! Regards kraybit | :Regarding Categories / Namespaces — Thanks for the enlightenment! : ) I don't really know MediaWiki, I'll stop using namespaces and edit them out! Regards kraybit | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Do you think i should use your view on [Open_Source_Projects] instead of tabular view anyway? | Do you think i should use your view on [Open_Source_Projects] instead of tabular view anyway? | ||
: Hi! Thanks : ) Not sure. Hm, it's also very nice to be able to sort those tables. The standard Wiki tables are also a lot easier to edit. I might have been going overkill. I guess the best would be if we could get a custom table class in the CSS? Perhaps CyberShadow could fix that. As for the missing logos, we could have a default generic logo for those. (I could make one, I have to sleep now though.) --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 02:45, 23 November 2012 (CET) | : Hi! Thanks : ) Not sure. Hm, it's also very nice to be able to sort those tables. The standard Wiki tables are also a lot easier to edit. I might have been going overkill. I guess the best would be if we could get a custom table class in the CSS? Perhaps CyberShadow could fix that. As for the missing logos, we could have a default generic logo for those. (I could make one, I have to sleep now though.) --[[User:Kraybit|Kraybit]] ([[User talk:Kraybit|talk]]) 02:45, 23 November 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User talk:Kraybit/Archive 1]] | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 24 November 2012
Hi! Great to see somebody working on getting the Wiki up and running. However, one suggestion: In MediaWiki, Categories are probably much better suited for sorting articles into groups such as »Community«, »Dev« and so on than Namespaces (the colon prefixes) are. Most normal Wiki pages should be in the Main namespace. Thanks! --Klickverbot (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2012 (CET)
- Regarding Categories / Namespaces — Thanks for the enlightenment! : ) I don't really know MediaWiki, I'll stop using namespaces and edit them out! Regards kraybit
- Hi kraybit, I took the liberty to move your message here. At least on Wikipedia, it is custom to hold conversations like this, so that they are easier to follow (use colons for indentation). Also, if you add --~~~~ at the end of your comments on talk pages, you get a nice signature with auto-generated links/timestamps. --Klickverbot (talk) 02:10, 23 November 2012 (CET)
Visualization
Hello, You've made a really nice view for vibe library. I don't think most projects have a logo though. Do you think i should use your view on [Open_Source_Projects] instead of tabular view anyway?
- Hi! Thanks : ) Not sure. Hm, it's also very nice to be able to sort those tables. The standard Wiki tables are also a lot easier to edit. I might have been going overkill. I guess the best would be if we could get a custom table class in the CSS? Perhaps CyberShadow could fix that. As for the missing logos, we could have a default generic logo for those. (I could make one, I have to sleep now though.) --Kraybit (talk) 02:45, 23 November 2012 (CET)
